0.10/0.12	% Problem    : Vampire---4.8_26997 : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.10/0.13	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.13/0.34	% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
0.13/0.34	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.13/0.34	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.13/0.34	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.13/0.34	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.13/0.34	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.13/0.34	% WCLimit    : 180
0.13/0.34	% DateTime   : Mon Jul  3 13:01:59 EDT 2023
0.13/0.34	% CPUTime    : 
0.19/0.47	Running higher-order theorem provingRunning: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.eElkeloaba/Vampire---4.8_26997
0.19/0.47	# Version: 3.1pre001-ho
0.19/0.48	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSMSSSNSSA.
0.19/0.48	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.19/0.48	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 900s (5) cores
0.19/0.48	# Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 180s (1) cores
0.19/0.48	# Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.19/0.48	# Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.19/0.48	# ehoh_best_sine_rwall with pid 27176 completed with status 0
0.19/0.48	# Result found by ehoh_best_sine_rwall
0.19/0.48	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSMSSSNSSA.
0.19/0.48	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.19/0.48	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 900s (5) cores
0.19/0.48	# Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 180s (1) cores
0.19/0.48	# SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
0.19/0.48	# Search class: HGHSF-FFMM11-SSSFFFBN
0.19/0.48	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.19/0.48	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 109s (1) cores
0.19/0.48	# ho_unfolding_3 with pid 27180 completed with status 0
0.19/0.48	# Result found by ho_unfolding_3
0.19/0.48	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSMSSSNSSA.
0.19/0.48	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.19/0.48	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 900s (5) cores
0.19/0.48	# Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 180s (1) cores
0.19/0.48	# SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
0.19/0.48	# Search class: HGHSF-FFMM11-SSSFFFBN
0.19/0.48	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.19/0.48	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 109s (1) cores
0.19/0.48	# Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
0.19/0.48	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.19/0.48	
0.19/0.48	# Proof found!
0.19/0.48	# SZS status Theorem
0.19/0.48	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.19/0.48	thf(decl_30, type, lAnna_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.19/0.48	thf(decl_33, type, lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.19/0.48	thf(decl_35, type, lBob_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.19/0.48	thf(decl_36, type, lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.19/0.48	thf(decl_38, type, lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.19/0.48	thf(decl_39, type, likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.19/0.48	thf(decl_42, type, parent_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.19/0.48	thf(con, conjecture, ?[X4:$i > $i > $o, X5:$i > $i > $o, X6:$i]:((((X4 @ X6 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)&~(((X5)=(X4))))&(X5 @ X6 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.eElkeloaba/Vampire---4.8_26997', con)).
0.19/0.48	thf(ax, axiom, (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.eElkeloaba/Vampire---4.8_26997', ax)).
0.19/0.48	thf(ax_013, axiom, (parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.eElkeloaba/Vampire---4.8_26997', ax_013)).
0.19/0.48	thf(ax_026, axiom, ~((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.eElkeloaba/Vampire---4.8_26997', ax_026)).
0.19/0.48	thf(ax_018, axiom, (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.eElkeloaba/Vampire---4.8_26997', ax_018)).
0.19/0.48	thf(ax_022, axiom, (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.eElkeloaba/Vampire---4.8_26997', ax_022)).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X4:$i > $i > $o, X5:$i > $i > $o, X6:$i]:((((X4 @ X6 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)&((X5)!=(X4)))&(X5 @ X6 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con])])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X59:$i > $i > $o, X60:$i > $i > $o, X61:$i]:((~(X59 @ X61 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|((X60)=(X59))|~(X60 @ X61 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X5:$i > $i > $o, X4:$i > $i > $o, X1:$i]:((((X5)=(X4))|~((X4 @ X1 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))|~((X5 @ X1 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_9, plain, (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X4:$i > $i > $o]:((((X4)=(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI))|~((X4 @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_11, plain, (parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax_013])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X95:$i, X94:$i, X4:$i > $i > $o]:((((X4 @ X94 @ X95)<=>(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X94 @ X95))|~((X4 @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)))), inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI)=(parent_THFTYPE_IiioI)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X4:$i > $i > $o, X2:$i]:(((X4 @ X1 @ X2)|~((X4 @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))|~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ X2)))), inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ![X96:$i, X97:$i]:(((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X96 @ X97)<=>(parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X96 @ X97))), inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_16, plain, ~(parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax_026])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i, X1:$i]:((((lAnna_THFTYPE_i)=(X1))|~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X2 @ X1)))), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_14])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_18, plain, (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax_018])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i]:(((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ X2)|~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ X2)))), inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_20, plain, (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax_022])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_21, plain, ~((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, ((lAnna_THFTYPE_i)=(lBill_THFTYPE_i)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_18])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, (parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_20])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_24, plain, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_22]), c_0_23])]), ['proof']).
0.19/0.48	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.19/0.48	# Parsed axioms                        : 71
0.19/0.48	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 28
0.19/0.48	# Initial clauses                      : 48
0.19/0.48	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 5
0.19/0.48	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 43
0.19/0.48	# Processed clauses                    : 115
0.19/0.48	# ...of these trivial                  : 7
0.19/0.48	# ...subsumed                          : 17
0.19/0.48	# ...remaining for further processing  : 91
0.19/0.48	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.19/0.48	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.19/0.48	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.19/0.48	# Backward-rewritten                   : 21
0.19/0.48	# Generated clauses                    : 75
0.19/0.48	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 81
0.19/0.48	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.19/0.48	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.19/0.48	# Paramodulations                      : 39
0.19/0.48	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.19/0.48	# NegExts                              : 0
0.19/0.48	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.19/0.48	# Total rewrite steps                  : 52
0.19/0.48	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.19/0.48	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.19/0.48	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.19/0.48	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.19/0.48	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.19/0.48	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.19/0.48	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.19/0.48	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.19/0.48	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.19/0.48	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.19/0.48	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.19/0.48	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.19/0.48	# Current number of processed clauses  : 35
0.19/0.48	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 21
0.19/0.48	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.19/0.48	#    Negative unit clauses             : 3
0.19/0.48	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 11
0.19/0.48	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 31
0.19/0.48	# ...number of literals in the above   : 73
0.19/0.48	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.19/0.48	# Current number of archived clauses   : 56
0.19/0.48	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 152
0.19/0.48	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 111
0.19/0.48	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 14
0.19/0.48	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 65
0.19/0.48	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.19/0.48	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 4
0.19/0.48	# BW rewrite match successes           : 3
0.19/0.48	# Condensation attempts                : 115
0.19/0.48	# Condensation successes               : 1
0.19/0.48	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 3710
0.19/0.48	
0.19/0.48	# -------------------------------------------------
0.19/0.48	# User time                : 0.011 s
0.19/0.48	# System time              : 0.001 s
0.19/0.48	# Total time               : 0.012 s
0.19/0.48	# Maximum resident set size: 1928 pages
0.19/0.48	
0.19/0.48	# -------------------------------------------------
0.19/0.48	# User time                : 0.014 s
0.19/0.48	# System time              : 0.003 s
0.19/0.48	# Total time               : 0.016 s
0.19/0.48	# Maximum resident set size: 1780 pages
0.19/0.48	% E---3.1 exiting
0.19/0.49	EOF